skip to main content

Study of problems in utilizing the functions of Kasinan protected forest between local residents and "Sadar Alas" community groups

1Master of Environmental Sciences, Postgraduate School, Diponegoro University, Indonesia

2Department of Biology, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Diponegoro University, Indonesia

3Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Engineering, Diponegoro University, Indonesia

Received: 11 Dec 2023; Revised: 5 Feb 2024; Accepted: 13 Mar 2024; Available online: 22 Mar 2024; Published: 1 Aug 2024.
Editor(s): Marcelinus Christwardana
Open Access Copyright (c) 2024 The Author(s). Published by Centre of Biomass and Renewable Energy (CBIORE)
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Understanding disputing styles is very important for solving a problem. The purpose of this research is to examine descriptively the problems in the Kasinan protected forest and to identify the conflicting styles of each party so that an appropriate resolution of the problems can be developed. This research was conducted in the protected forest of Kasinan, precisely in Pesanggrahan Village, Batu City. Data collection was carried out qualitatively, namely through interviews, observation, and documentation. The analysis used adapts the Disputing Style Analysis (AGATA). The results of the research show that the problems in the Kasinan protected forest stem from the use of the forest for tourism by relying on water sources from the Kasinan protected forest. The impact was a decrease in the discharge of water flowing into the rice fields and residents' homes, resulting in protests from residents. Actors involved in the problem include residents of Pesanggrahan village, HIPPA-HIPPAM, Pesanggrahan Village Government, Sadar Alas community, Perhutani KPH Malang, BKPH Pujon, and Walhi. Each party has various problems, including environmental beauty, reducing water discharge, and tourism interests. Communities are the most disadvantaged because they feel the impact directly. Each side has a different style of conflict. However, especially for residents of the Sadar Alas community, they have a competitive dispute style. So, in an accommodation style, the village government formed a team of Kasinan Forest Utilization Problem Resolution Facilities and held meetings including villagers, HIPPA-HIPPAM, Alas Awareness Community, Perhutani, and the Mayor of Batu City to negotiate and facilitate the proposal for zoning based on local policies so that the environment is beautiful. and the tour continues. So support from parties who have full authority, such as the Mayor of Batu City, is needed in order to realize a resolution to the conflict.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Conflict Analysis; Utilization of Protected Forests; Kasinan Protected Forest

Article Metrics:

  1. Ahmadi, R. (2014). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media
  2. Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik (edisi revisi). Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
  3. Bungin, B. (2007). Penelitian Kualitatif Komunikasi, Ekonomi, Kebijakan Publik, dan Ilmu Sosial Lainnya. Edisi Kedua. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group
  4. Bungin, B. (2011). Penelitian Kualitatif Edisi Kedua. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media
  5. Gamin, G. Kartodihardjo, H., Kolopaking, L. M., & Boer, R. (2014). Menyelesaikan konflik penguasaan kawasan hutan melalui pendekatan gaya sengketa para pihak di Kesatuan Pengelolaan Hutan Lakitan. Jurnal Analisis Ke-bijakan Kehutanan, 11(1), 71-90
  6. Hadi, S. P. (2010). Resolusi Konflik Lingkungan (Cetakan Ketiga). Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro
  7. Hadi, S. P. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian Lingkungan Bidang Sosial. Semarang: Undip Press Semarang
  8. Hidayat, H.., Haba, J. dan Siburian, R. (2011). Politik Ekologi Pengelolaan Taman Nasional Era Otda. Jakarta: LIPI Press
  9. Moleong, L. J. (2004). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya
  10. Palmolina, M., dan Fauziyah, E. (2020). Pemetaan konflik taman nasional gunung ciremai di desa Cisantana, Cigugur, Kuningan, Jawa Barat. Jurnal WASIAN Vol.7 No.2 Tahun 2020:137-151. DOI: 10.20886/jwas.v7i2.5393
  11. Pasya, G., & Sirait, M. T. (2011). Analisis Gaya Bersengketa (AGATA): Panduan Ringkas untuk Membantu Melilih bentuk Penyelesaian Sengketa Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam. Bogor: The Samdhana Institute
  12. Soekanto, S. (1983). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Rineka cipta
  13. Soemarwoto, O. (2001). Ekologi, Lingkungan dan Pembangunan (Cetakan kesembilan). Jakarta: Djambatan Press
  14. Sugiyono. (2010). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta
  15. Susan, N. (2019). Sosiologi Konflik Teori-teori dan Analisis Edisi Ketiga. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group
  16. Syafi’i, A. (2005). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Surabaya: Elkaf
  17. Thomas, K.W. dan Kilmann. (1974). Thomas Kilmann conflict mode instrument. Mountain View, CA: Xicom and CPP
  18. Wirawan. (2016). Konflik dan Manajemen Konflik: Teori, Aplikasi, dan Penelitian (cetakan keempat). Jakarta: Salemba Humanika
  19. Peraturan Daerah Kota Batu Nomor 7 Tahun 2011 Tentang Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah. http://batukota.bps.go.id

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.